Sunday, August 28, 2016

OTDR Index of Refraction


The basic optical property of a material is the index of refraction. 
It is also one of the key parameter that needs to be key-in into OTDR as to get accurate result on actual fiber optics distance measurement.
The index of refraction (n) measures the speed of light in an optical medium. 
Picture
The speed of light (c) in free space or vacumm is 
Picture
Therefore index of refraction of a material is equivalent to :-
Picture
When light enters  a different material ( from glass into air or from air into glass)is   the speed changes. 
This causes the light to bend or refract.
Light will always travel slower in the fiber material than in air. 


Picture
The index of refraction for glass  is approximately  1.50 or lower.
The index of refraction for air  is exactly 1.00. 

In order to get the actual fiber optics length measurement using OTDR, one  is required to enter fiber optics index of refraction into one of OTDR key parameters. The fiber optics index of refraction could be obtained from the fiber optics cable manufacturer.

OTDR Setup - Index of Refraction & Fiber Distance


Picture
All OTDRs regardless of brand have four basic setup requirement i.e. the OTDR user is required to key in these four basic data parameters into OTDR in order to get good and accurate fiber trace analysis.

The required data parameters are :-

  1. Testing Range - Refer to Article HERE
  2. Pulse Width - Refer to Article HERE
  3. Index of Refraction 
  4. Averaging Time
Index of Refraction
Picture
The relationship between distance and velocity or speed is as shown below -
You can review previous article on Index of Refraction HERE or HERE

As previously mentioned index of refraction measures the speed of light in optical medium. It is a function of velocity of light in vacuum and velocity of light in the opticel fiber medium or simply stated as below -
Picture
Velocity of light in fiber optics can be further expressed in terms of velocity of light in vacuum and index of refraction. This is done by rearranging the index of refraction equation as stated above.
Picture
Knowing that C or velocity of light in vacuum is a constant value
Picture
Then the distance of fiber optics as measured by OTDR can be simplied as shown below
Picture
The index of refraction, n,  is a known value which can be obtained from the fiber optics manufacturer. While t , OTDR pulse width  and its backscatter light travelling time , can be measured by OTDR automatically ie. the initial time laser pulse width launched into fiber optics and time taken by backscattered light returned back into OTDR.

Therefore, the measured of fiber optics distance is a function of index of refraction.
As value of IOR increases the measured fiber optic distance or length is getting shorter.
Picture
As value of IOR decreases the measured fiber optic distance or length is getting longer.
Picture
If the OTDR index of refraction does not match to that of fiber optics under testing IOR then the OTDR distance traces might show the incorrect results.

If the fiber optics under testing IOR is not known, then the end-user can use the OTDR default  IOR setting.

Typical fiber optics IOR value is between 1.4000 to 1.6000

Picture
Rule of Thumb
Always obtain the fiber optics Index of Refraction values from corresponding fiber optics manufacturer.

Friday, August 19, 2016

Microsoft & Facebook Undersea Fiber Optics Cable


Microsoft and Facebook have jointly announced their plan to build a new undersea cable connecting the United States to Southern Europe. The cable, dubbed Marea, will link Virginia Beach to Bilbao, an autonomous Basque community located in northern Spain. The two companies expect to break ground on the cable in August 2016, with completion estimated by October 2017.
The new 4,101 mile (6,600 km) cable is expected to be the fastest undersea cable ever constructed, with eight fiber pairs and an estimated data capacity of 160Tbps (20TB/s). The cable’s route is deliberately different from conventional transatlantic cables, which typically terminate in New York or New Jersey. Microsoft claims that this routing decision will help ensure consistent and reliable connections, presumably because it can serve as a backup if something goes wrong with the current transatlantic cables.

Cloud-driven cable

The reason Microsoft and Facebook are teaming up in the first place is because they want to ensure robust infrastructure is in place to take advantage of their cloud computing initiatives. Microsoft’s blog post states:
We’re seeing an ever-increasing customer demand for high speed, reliable connections for Microsoft cloud services, including Bing, Office 365, Skype, Xbox Live, and Microsoft Azure. As the world continues to move towards a future based on cloud computing, Microsoft is committed to building out the unprecedented level of global infrastructure required to support ever faster and even more resilient connections to our cloud services. This robust, global infrastructure will enable customers to more quickly and reliably store, manage, transmit and access their data in the Microsoft Cloud.
Later in the post the company claims that Marea is designed to interoperate with a variety of network equipment, thanks to an open design process that both companies believe will lower costs and make it easier to integrate upgrades to the cable as faster transmission standards and improvements in optical data transmission become available. Whether or not this is true is a matter of some debate. While the Open Compute Project that Facebook started several years ago has reportedly save certain companies a great deal of money, it hasn’t done a great job of meeting the needs of enterprise IT departments. In this case, however, Microsoft and Facebook jointly own the cable and its hardware, which should simplify tech roll-outs and adoption.
Presumably all data transmitted over the cable will be encrypted to prevent the NSA from wiretapping and intercepting information, but the blog post doesn’t specifically mention this. Major companies like Facebook, Microsoft, and Google have all been taking steps to reduce the chance of NSA spying — foreign companies and individuals are much less likely to work with a vendor if they believe the company collaborates with the US government to monitor foreign citizens or corporations.

Google’s ‘FASTER’ undersea cable goes online with 60 Tbps of bandwidth


You probably have a wireless network at home, but for some applications a wired connection is still more reliable. It’s the same in internet backbone communications — satellites help keep the world in sync, but the best connections across the globe rely upon undersea fiber optic cables. A new undersea cable constructed with Google’sbacking has just gone online linking the US west coast with Japan.
The cable, which has the fitting name “FASTER,” can transmit 60 terabytes of data per second, more than any other active undersea cable. It’s about 10 million times faster than your home broadband connection on a good day. The new cable will benefit users near one end or the other when they need to ping a server on the other end. It doesn’t boost their own bandwidth, but it could allow them to take fuller advantage of it. FASTER also includes an additional connection from Japan to Taiwan, which has 20 Tbps of bandwidth and is owned completely by Google.
Google joined this ambitious construction project back in 2014 when it partnered with five other companies: NEC, China Mobile, China Telecom, Global Transit, and KDDI. The project has cost about $300 million to complete, but it will offer huge speed increases for data transmission between Asia and North America. Google’s participation in the project guarantees it 10 Tbps of dedicated bandwidth on the FASTER cable. Google is also planning to launch its Google Cloud Platform East Asia in Tokyo this year. The dedicated bandwidth from FASTER will result in faster transfers and lower latency for its customers.
FASTER stretches some 9,00 kilometers (5,592 miles) across the ocean. The US end is in Bandon, Oregon, and the Japanese end plugs into Shima and Chikura. The US cable location places it very near to Google’s data center in The Dalles. FASTER uses six fiberpairs to push all that bandwidth using 100 different wavelengths of light. Every 60 kilometers, there’s a repeater that re-energizes the data to ensure no data is lost along the way, according to Google’s senior vice president of technical infrastructure Urs Hölzle.
This cable might be the speed king right now, but that won’t be the case for long. Earlier this year, Microsoft and Facebook announced they would be laying a cable from the US to southern Europe with a capacity of 160 Tbps across eight cable pairs. I guess Google will just have to limp along with FASTER.

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

OTDR Reflective and Non-Reflective Events


OTDR (Optical Time Domain Reflectometer) is widely used in all phases of a fiber system's life, from construction to maintenance to fault locating and restoration. However, even a trained and experienced OTDR operator may have difficulty interpreting a fiber trace at times. There are a few cases where it is almost impossible to get an exact distance or loss determination based on one measurement. In some extraordinary circumstances it may be necessary to test a fiber with different set-up conditions or from both ends in order to get meaningful results.
Non-Reflective Break
When a fiber gets cut or broken the end may shatter so that the light hitting the end may not reflect at all. Also, the end of the fiber may become immersed in oil or grease, which may also eliminate the Fresnel reflection. When this happens, the trace will suddenly fall off into the noise level. There may be a rounding-off of the backscatter where it falls off so that it may be difficult to judge where the fall-off point is. The best method to determine the break point is to use a 2-Point loss method to determine at which point the backscatter level drops off by 0.5dB. Place the left cursor as near to the end as possible but still on the backscatter. Then move the right cursor in towards the left cursor until the loss between the two reads 0.5dB. The actual end of the fiber should be very close to the point measured by the right cursor. To increase your confidence in this location, take the OTDR to the other end of the fiber and test back to the break from the other side. It is possible that the other side of the break will reflect some light. (Keep in mind that the fiber could be broken at more than one point.)
Non-Reflective Event
Figure 1. Non-Reflective Event
Gain Spice
Sometimes when two fibers are spliced together, the backscatter level at the splice point shifts up instead of down. At first glance this would appear to be a "gain" in power at the splice. The OTDR may even indicate a negative splice loss. What has happened is that the two fibers were mismatched: the second fiber has a higher backscattering coefficient than the first, and more light gets scattered back by it. The OTDR sensor reads this as a higher level than the end of the first fiber and plots the corresponding data points higher up on the screen. If the same splice is tested from the opposite direction, the OTDR would indicate a higher "normal" loss than the amount of the "negative" loss. In this case, the true splice loss value is the average of the two readings. That is, if the "gainer" reads -0.25 dB, and the opposite direction reads 0.45 dB, then the actual splice loss is 0.1 dB.
Figure 2 shows what a "gain" splice looks like on an OTDR display in comparison to what a "normal" splice looks like. Note that the slopes of the two fiber traces are different. The second fiber has a steeper slope than the first fiber, which indicates a higher backscatter level throughout the fiber. It would normally appear higher on the screen than the first fiber because it returns more light to the OTDR. A difference in Index of Refraction can produce different backscatter levels, and thus different slopes of the trace. The other possible cause of a gain is that the "mode field diameter" (which is related to the fiber's core size) is different in the two fibers, which causes more backscattering to come back from the second fiber.
Treatment of Gain Splices
Figure 2. Treatment of Gain Splices
When a gain splice occurs, it is because the two fibers being spliced together are mismatched in some way. This phenomena is most apparent when you splice fibers made by two different fiber manufacturers. Because of the inherent difference in optical characteristics between any two fiber manufacturers you can expect the two fibers to be mismatched, thereby producing "gainers."
The average of all splices in a fiber span [a span is one or more fibers spliced together to make a continuous fiber link from one connector end to the other] is usually the benchmark used in constructing a system. If the average is equal to or better than the goal, then the overall loss budget planned for will be met. Gain splices can be confusing in determining splice loss averages since they usually are displayed as a negative loss on the OTDR. In order to determine the average splice loss value for a string of splices in a fiber span, you need to include the gain splice values along with the normal loss values. That is, use BOTH the positive and negative values as displayed by the OTDR in summing the total of all splice loss values. Then divide by the number of splices summed.
The most accurate method of determining the average splice loss values in a fiber span is to make a bi-directional measurement of each splice—that is, measure the splice of Fiber AB to Fiber BC first from the Fiber A end, then from the Fiber C end—individually average each splice loss, then take the average of the entire span. This method is time consuming and can usually only be done after the entire system has been spliced. The next best method is to take the one-directional average of all splices in a span using the splice values measured from the same direction only. Normally, when a gain occurs, the next splice will be a higher-thannormal loss. This is because the fiber with the higher backscatter level causing the gain will also cause a higher measured loss going to the next fiber, and the effects of the two splice measurements will cancel out. Avoid calculating splice loss averages using one-directional splice loss values when the individual splice values along the span were measured from different directions.
Ghost Reflections
Sometimes you will see a Fresnel reflection where you don't expect one—usually after the end of a fiber. This usually happens when a large reflection occurs in a short fiber. The reflected light actually bounces back and forth within the fiber, causing one or more false reflections to show up at multiple distances from the initial large (true) reflection. That is, if a large reflection occurs at 1,325 feet, and there is an unexpected reflection at 2,650 feet (twice the distance to the first) and another at 3,975 feet (three times the distance to the first), then it is likely the 2nd and 3rd reflections are "ghosts." (Figure 3)
Figure 3. OTDR Ghosts
Figure 3. OTDR Ghosts
Another type of ghosting happens when you set the range shorter than the actual length of the fiber (in order to see details up close in a very long fiber). This allows the OTDR to send additional pulses of light into the fiber before all of the backscatter and reflections from the first pulse have cleared the whole fiber. When you get more than one pulse in the fiber at one time, you set up a condition where returned light from different pulses arrive at the OTDR at the same time, producing "unpredictable results." Often this will take the form of a series of reflections, or excessive noise, occurring in one area of the fiber.
Here are a few "ghost-busting" techniques you can use to determine if ghosts are occurring and then possibly eliminate them:
1. Measure the distance to the suspect reflection. Then place a cursor half this distance on the fiber. If an expected reflection is at the half-way mark, then the suspect is probably a ghost.
Suppress or reduce the known (true) reflection. By making the amount of returned power smaller, the ghost will also be reduced (or eliminated). To reduce the reflection, you can use index matching gel at the reflection, or reduce the amount of power going to the reflective point by selecting a shorter pulse width or by adding attenuation in the fiber before the reflection.
3. Change the Distance Range (Display Range) of the OTDR. In some OTDRs, a ghost is caused when the Distance Range is too short. Increase the Range setting and the ghost may disappear.
4. If a ghost seems to occur in the fiber, then measure the loss across the suspected reflection. A ghost will show no loss across it when you do a splice loss measurement
Sourced : http://www.fs.com/how-to-solve-the-common-problems-in-otdr-testing-aid-140.html

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Fujikura CT-30 Cleaver Blade Rotation


  • Assuming this is CT-30 Fujikura cleaver blade. 
  • Each designated number can cleave up to 1000 times. 
  • Should your fiber cleaving is not in good shape then the designated number blade may have reached up to 1000 cleavings.
  • In order to get a good fiber cleaving you have to rotate the next designated number on the blade.
  • The following video shows you how to perform blade rotation.


Thursday, August 11, 2016

OTDR Set-Up - Index of Refraction


Picture
All OTDRs regardless of brand have four basic setup requirement i.e. the OTDR user is required to key in these four basic data parameters into OTDR in order to get good and accurate fiber trace analysis.

The required data parameters are :-

  1. Testing Range - Refer to Article HERE
  2. Pulse Width - Refer to Article HERE
  3. Index of Refraction 
  4. Averaging Time
Index of Refraction
Picture
The relationship between distance and velocity or speed is as shown below -
You can review previous article on Index of Refraction HERE or HERE

As previously mentioned index of refraction measures the speed of light in optical medium. It is a function of velocity of light in vacuum and velocity of light in the opticel fiber medium or simply stated as below -
Picture
Velocity of light in fiber optics can be further expressed in terms of velocity of light in vacuum and index of refraction. This is done by rearranging the index of refraction equation as stated above.
Picture
Knowing that C or velocity of light in vacuum is a constant value
Picture
Then the distance of fiber optics as measured by OTDR can be simplied as shown below
Picture
The index of refraction, n,  is a known value which can be obtained from the fiber optics manufacturer. While t , OTDR pulse width  and its backscatter light travelling time , can be measured by OTDR automatically ie. the initial time laser pulse width launched into fiber optics and time taken by backscattered light returned back into OTDR.

Therefore, the measured of fiber optics distance is a function of index of refraction.
As value of IOR increases the measured fiber optic distance or length is getting shorter.
Picture
As value of IOR decreases the measured fiber optic distance or length is getting longer.
Picture
If the OTDR index of refraction does not match to that of fiber optics under testing IOR then the OTDR distance traces might show the incorrect results.

If the fiber optics under testing IOR is not known, then the end-user can use the OTDR default  IOR setting.

Typical fiber optics IOR value is between 1.4000 to 1.6000

Picture
Rule of Thumb
Always obtain the fiber optics Index of Refraction values from corresponding fiber optics manufacturer.

Sunday, August 7, 2016

OTDR Set-Up - Testing Range


Picture
All OTDRs regardless of brand have four basic setup requirement i.e. the OTDR user is required to key in these four basic data parameters into OTDR in order to get good and accurate fiber trace analysis.

The required data parameters are :-

  1. Testing Range 
  2. Pulse Width - Refer Article HERE
  3. Index of Refraction - Refer Article HERE
  4. Averaging Time - Refer Article HERE
Fiber Optics Testing Range or Distance of Fiber Optics to Test
Many OTDRs have automatic length detection functions unless the end-user knows the approximate fiber distance then testing range can be set manually.
The following diagrams provide OTDR traces in accordance to OTDR testing range settings.
Too Short Testing Range

Picture
  • Assuming the fiber optics approximate distance is 1000 meter. 
  • The OTDR testing range is set to 500 meter .
  • The OTDR image / tracse  only show half of the distance thus provide inaccurate testing results.

Too Long Distance Range
Picture
  • Assuming the fiber optics approximate distance is 1000 meter. 
  • The OTDR testing range is set to 5000 meter .
  • The OTDR image / trace shown is compressed into a scale of 1:5 thus giving smaller OTDR traces which can lead into inaccurate measured values.

Good Distance Range
  • Assuming the fiber optics approximate distance is 1000 meter. 
  • The OTDR testing range is set to 1500 meter - 2000 meter .
  • The OTDR image / traces shown is a good OTDR chart thus measured values.
Picture

Picture
Rule of Thumb
The OTDR Testing Range must always be at least 25% greater than fiber optics under testing.

Friday, August 5, 2016

OTDR Setting UP - Pulse Width

Picture
All OTDRs regardless of brand have four basic setup requirement i.e. the OTDR user is required to key in these four basic data parameters into OTDR in order to get good and accurate fiber trace analysis.

The required data parameters are :-
  1. Testing Range 
  2. Pulse Width
  3. Index of Refraction 
  4. Averaging Time 
What is Pulse Width?
Picture
  • OTDR pulse width determines length of fiber that can be measured before OTDR traces become noise.
  • Larger pulse width provides larger dynamic range 
  • Narrow pulse width provides reduced dynamic range. 
  • Dynamice range is associated with pulse width and in turn describes length of fiber that can be measured by OTDRs.
Picture
  • Always start testing with a shorter pulse width. 
  • The shorter pulse width is useful for locating any faults that may otherwise be hidden in longer pulse width.
  • A gradual increase in pulse width is necessary to prevent two or more faults from overlapping.

Picture
Rule of Thumb
Long pulse width for longer fiber distance.
Short pulse width for shorter fiber distance.
Always start with shorter pulse width and gradually increase the pulse width to detect all possible fault traces.

Thursday, August 4, 2016

OTDR Set-up - Averaging


Picture
All OTDRs regardless of brand have four basic setup requirement i.e. the OTDR user is required to key in these four basic data parameters into OTDR in order to get good and accurate fiber trace analysis.

The required data parameters are :-
  1. Testing Range - Refer Article Coming Soon
  2. Pulse Width - Refer Article Coming Soon
  3. Index of Refraction - Refer Article Coming Soon
  4. Averaging Time
What is Averaging ?
Averaging refers to time taken to have a good OTDR traces as shown below.

Picture
Picture
However, the longer averaging time would provide better OTDR traces but it wil be time consuming for OTDR to provide such traces.

The before averaging  or low averaging is sufficient should the end-user only interested to find out the approximate fiber optics link distance.
Picture
The about right averaging is able to provide good measurement loss.
Picture
The higher averaging time provides better OTDR traces but OTDR takes extra times to do the averaging and display better traces.
Picture
Picture
The end-user is required to set the averaging time in order to get good  test measurement results